Plundering the
Vineyard:
Foxes as Sexual Predators in Theocritus
Benjamin V. Hicks (University of Texas, Austin)
In
this paper, I argue that the foxes in the ekphrasis of
the kissubion in Theocritus’ first Idyll can be understood as sexual predators and that this
understanding enhances the programmatic significance of Idyll 1. The
third scene of the ekphrasis depicts a boy absorbed in the task of plaiting a wicker
cage for the cicada while two foxes plunder his vineyard. This image
has been traditionally understood (Arnott 1996 and Halperin 1983) as reflecting
the Alexandrian poet’s obsession with poetic composition in lieu of hard
physical work. But what do the foxes symbolize and how does their appearance
contribute to the overall meaning of the poem? The fox’s erotic symbolism
has been missed by previous interpreters because foxes are more known for
their trickiness in the Aesopic corpus and Stithe-Thompson’s folklore index
reveals no seduction fables with foxes in the Greco-Roman tradition. Furthermore,
the closest parallels with Theocritus’ use of the fox are actually with the
Near-Eastern literary tradition which he probably encountered during his
stay in Alexandria.
We
can infer the sexual symbolism of the foxes in Idyll 1 by comparing it to other passages where the symbolism
is clearer. In Idyll 5.112,
the scholiast explains that Komatas uses the fox plundering the vineyard
to represent Lakon who has moved from a pederastic relationship with Komatas
to seducing boys of his own. Another key passage occurs at Song
of Songs 2.15 where the fox represents
competing lovers who threaten to seduce the beloved. Recent research
on the Song of Songs has explored its connections to Egyptian love songs,
which also depict the fox as an erotic predator. Furthermore, the Greek
tradition frequently uses the grape as a symbol for the desired lover as
indicated by AP 5.20, 5.304 and 12.205, and LSJ s.v. ὄμφαξ. I
conclude by suggesting that the symbolism of the fox as erotic predator enhances
our understanding of the programmatic nature of Theocritus’ first Idyll.